
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs EPYC 9355P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

EPYC 9355P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9355P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,699.99) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,026) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+8%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,699.99) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,026) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX and EPYC 9355P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.

EPYC 9355P
The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9355P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9355P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9355P uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX scores 93,660 against the EPYC 9355P's 97,249 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+23% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+18% | 3.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 93,660 | 97,249+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 60,336 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,349 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 30,722 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9355P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs 12 (EPYC 9355P). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) and SP5 (EPYC 9355P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 6 TB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation, EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X; EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX launched at $2899 MSRP, while the EPYC 9355P debuted at $2998. At current prices ($2699.99 vs $3026), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $326 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9355P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 7.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2899-3% | $2998 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2699.99-11% | $3026 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+8% | 32.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















