Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon 6741P

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
Threadripper Pro family
···
VS
Intel

Xeon 6741P

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon 6741P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon 6741P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon 6741P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,522 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
  • Delivers 41.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (93,660 vs 100,660).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 288 MB).
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 300W.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

  • +7.5% higher PassMark.
  • +125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 300W instead of 350W, a 50W reduction.
  • 6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.8 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6741P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is ahead with a 30.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P pulls ahead with 7.5% better PassMark. Xeon 6741P also has the bigger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.5% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6741P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6741P comes in 52.5% more expensive on MSRP at $4,421 MSRP versus $2,899 MSRP, and it still gives you 7.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 30.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is also 41.9% better value on MSRP (32.3 vs 22.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6741P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs Xeon 6741P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.

Intel

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6741P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX scores 93,660 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 7.2% lead for the Xeon 6741P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,349 vs 3,195, a 4.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon 6741P
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
48 / 96+100%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+42%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+68%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
288 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm
Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture
Shimada Peak (2025)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
93,660
100,660+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi
60,336
Geekbench 6 Single
3,349+5%
3,195
Geekbench 6 Multi
30,722
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6741P supports up to 4 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon 6741P
Socket
sTR5
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB
4 TB+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
136+6%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon 6741P
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use
High-end Workstation
Data Center
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX was priced at $2899, while the Xeon 6741P came in at $4421. On launch pricing ($2899 vs $4421), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX was $1522 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX delivers 32.3 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 34.6% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WXXeon 6741P
MSRP
$2899-34%
$4421
Performance per Dollar
32.3+42%
22.8
Release Date
2025
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.