EPYC 9754
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9754
2023Why buy it
- ✅+73.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $9,001 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (60,336 vs 104,584).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than EPYC 9754?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 104 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 5% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 60,336 (53.7% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 3,349, a 68.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 30,722 (58.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+433% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+74% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 4.2 GHz+87% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 98,450+5% | 93,660 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 104,584+73% | 60,336 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,634 | 3,349+105% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,825 | 30,722+83% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9754 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Native | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9754 was priced at $11900, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX came in at $2899. On launch pricing ($11900 vs $2899), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX was $9001 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 32.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 118.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11900 | $2899-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 32.3+289% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
