EPYC 9734
EPYC 9754
EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9754 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9754 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9754: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9734
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 340W instead of 360W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9754
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 102,286).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9734 better than EPYC 9754?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9734 vs EPYC 9754 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9734
The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.
EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9734 packs 112 cores / 224 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9754 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). Both are built on the Bergamo (2023) architecture using a 5 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9734 scores 102,286 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 3.8% lead for the EPYC 9734. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | EPYC 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 112 / 224 | 128 / 256+14% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.25 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Bergamo (2023) |
| PassMark | 102,286+4% | 98,450 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 104,584 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,634 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,825 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9734) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | EPYC 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | EPYC 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | Data Center / Cloud Native |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9734 was priced at $9600, while the EPYC 9754 came in at $11900. On launch pricing ($9600 vs $11900), EPYC 9734 was $2300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9734 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9734 the 25.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9734 | EPYC 9754 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9600-19% | $11900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7+29% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9734 and EPYC 9754
