EPYC 9654
EPYC 9734
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9734 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9734 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9734: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9654
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌23% HIGHER MSRP$11,805 MSRPvs$9,600 MSRP
EPYC 9734
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,205 less on MSRP ($9,600 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9654 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (102,286 vs 119,246).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9654 better than EPYC 9734?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9734 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9654
The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.
EPYC 9734
The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9654 packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the EPYC 9734 offers 112 cores / 224 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9654 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9654 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9734 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9654 scores 119,246 against the EPYC 9734's 102,286 — a 15.3% lead for the EPYC 9654. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9654 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9734.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 112 / 224+17% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Bergamo (2023) |
| PassMark | 119,246+17% | 102,286 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9654) and SP5 (EPYC 9734).
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9654 targets Data Center, EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+; EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center | Data Center / High Density |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9654 was priced at $11805, while the EPYC 9734 came in at $9600. On launch pricing ($11805 vs $9600), EPYC 9734 was $2205 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9734 — making the EPYC 9734 the 5.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9734 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11805 | $9600-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 10.7+6% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9734
