
EPYC 9654

EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9654P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9654P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9654P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9654
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,250 vs 2,025).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 23,214).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($11,805 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
EPYC 9654P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+62% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $1,180 less on MSRP ($10,625 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($10,625 MSRP vs $11,805 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9654P better than EPYC 9654?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 9654P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9654
The EPYC 9654 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 119,246 points. Launch price was $11,805.

EPYC 9654P
The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9654 and EPYC 9654P share an identical 96-core/192-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9654 scores 119,246 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 9654. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 2,025, a 47.3% lead for the EPYC 9654P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 23,214 (14.9% advantage for the EPYC 9654P). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192 | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total) | 384 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 119,246+3% | 116,324 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | 2,025+62% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | 23,214+16% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9654) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9654 targets Data Center, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9654 rivals Xeon 8592+; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9654 was priced at $11805, while the EPYC 9654P came in at $10625. On launch pricing ($11805 vs $10625), EPYC 9654P was $1180 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9654 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9654P the 8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9654 | EPYC 9654P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11805 | $10625-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.1 | 10.9+8% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















