EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6781P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9734

112 Cores224 Thrd340 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6781P

80 Cores160 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9734

112 / 224

102,286

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6781P

80 / 160

117,946

+15.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9734

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6781P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (102,286 vs 117,946).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 336 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).

Xeon 6781P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($8,960 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6781P better than EPYC 9734?

Yes. Xeon 6781P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 15.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6781P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6781P is the stronger fit. You are getting 15.3% better PassMark, backed by 80 cores and 160 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 31.3% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6781P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6781P comes in $640 cheaper on MSRP at $8,960 MSRP versus $9,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 23.5% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6781P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 31.3% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 80 cores / 160 threads instead of 112/224. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9734 vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9734

The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.

Xeon 6781P

The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9734 packs 112 cores / 224 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6781P (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9734 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9734 scores 102,286 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 14.2% lead for the Xeon 6781P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9734 vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon 6781P
Cores / Threads	112 / 224+40%	80 / 160
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	336 MB (total)+31%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	102,286	117,946+15%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9734 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9734 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6781P — the Xeon 6781P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9734 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9734) vs 8 (Xeon 6781P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9734) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon 6781P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9734) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon 6781P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / High Density	Data Center / Cloud Scale

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9734 was priced at $9600, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($9600 vs $8960), Xeon 6781P was $640 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9734 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Xeon 6781P the 21.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9734	Xeon 6781P
MSRP	$9600	$8960-7%
Performance per Dollar	10.7	13.2+23%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search EPYC 9734 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6781P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.