EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9734

AMD

EPYC 9455P

48 Cores96 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 9734

112 Cores224 Thrd340 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9734 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9734 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9734: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9455P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $4,781 less on MSRP ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.3 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($4,819 MSRP vs $9,600 MSRP).
  • Draws 300W instead of 340W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9734

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9455P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (102,286 vs 116,926).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 24.3 PassMark/$ ($9,600 MSRP vs $4,819 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 9455P better than EPYC 9734?
    Yes. EPYC 9455P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 14.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9455P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9455P is the stronger fit. You are getting 14.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 9455P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9455P comes in $4,781 cheaper on MSRP at $4,819 MSRP versus $9,600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 127.7% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9455P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 112/224. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    EPYC 9455P vs EPYC 9734 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9455P

    The EPYC 9455P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 116,926 points. Launch price was $4,819.

    AMD

    EPYC 9734

    The EPYC 9734 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 112 cores and 224 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 102,286 points. Launch price was $9,600.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9455P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9734 offers 112 cores / 224 threads — the EPYC 9734 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9455P versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 9734 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9455P (base: 3.15 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 9455P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9734 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9455P scores 116,926 against the EPYC 9734's 102,286 — a 13.4% lead for the EPYC 9455P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9734
    Cores / Threads
    48 / 96
    112 / 224+133%
    Boost Clock
    4.4 GHz+47%
    3 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.15 GHz+43%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    256 MB (total)
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm-20%
    5 nm
    Architecture
    Turin (2024)
    Bergamo (2023)
    PassMark
    116,926+14%
    102,286
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,962
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,898
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9455P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9734 — the EPYC 9455P supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9455P supports up to 9 TB of RAM compared to 6 TB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9455P) and SP5 (EPYC 9734).

    FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9734
    Socket
    SP5
    SP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6000+25%
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    9 TB+50%
    6 TB
    RAM Channels
    12
    12
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9455P targets Data Center / Single Socket, EPYC 9734 targets Data Center / High Density. Direct competitor: EPYC 9455P rivals Xeon 6766E; EPYC 9734 rivals Xeon 6780E.

    FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9734
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    Target Use
    Data Center / Single Socket
    Data Center / High Density
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9455P was priced at $4819, while the EPYC 9734 came in at $9600. On launch pricing ($4819 vs $9600), EPYC 9455P was $4781 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9455P delivers 24.3 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9734 — making the EPYC 9455P the 77.9% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9455PEPYC 9734
    MSRP
    $4819-50%
    $9600
    Performance per Dollar
    24.3+127%
    10.7
    Release Date
    2024
    2023

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.