Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3595X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9754

128 Cores256 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon w9-3595X

60 Cores120 Thrd385 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9754
128 / 256
98,450
+0.9%
brand logoRyzen AI Max+ 395
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
Xeon w9-3595X
60 / 120
97,534
0.0%
brand logoCore i7-10850H
brand logoCore i9-11900
brand logoCore i9-12900HX
brand logoCore i7-13790F
brand logoXeon w7-2475X
brand logoXeon w9-3475X
brand logoXeon w7-3565X
brand logoXeon w9-3575X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9754
low163 FPS
medium134 FPS
high113 FPS
ultra89 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low316 FPS
medium306 FPS
high246 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9754
low238 FPS
medium211 FPS
high174 FPS
ultra138 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low384 FPS
medium332 FPS
high270 FPS
ultra236 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9754
low650 FPS
medium541 FPS
high481 FPS
ultra422 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low1025 FPS
medium1086 FPS
high1020 FPS
ultra875 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9754
low876 FPS
medium793 FPS
high682 FPS
ultra592 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low1147 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high901 FPS
ultra802 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9754
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9754
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9754
low299 FPS
medium228 FPS
high206 FPS
ultra185 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low326 FPS
medium244 FPS
high212 FPS
ultra189 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9754
low250 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low276 FPS
medium247 FPS
high200 FPS
ultra168 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9754
low308 FPS
medium277 FPS
high257 FPS
ultra210 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low331 FPS
medium301 FPS
high278 FPS
ultra236 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9754
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
Xeon w9-3595X
low290 FPS
medium266 FPS
high226 FPS
ultra210 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
  • ✅Draws 360W instead of 385W, a 25W reduction.
  • ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (104,584 vs 130,000).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).

Xeon w9-3595X

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +26.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $6,011 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 100.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than EPYC 9754?
Yes. Xeon w9-3595X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 26.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 24.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3595X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3595X is the stronger fit. You are getting 24.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 60 cores and 120 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w9-3595X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3595X comes in $6,011 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.2% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w9-3595X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), more multi-core headroom with 60 cores / 120 threads instead of 128/256, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Intel

Xeon w9-3595X

The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 68 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 43% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 130,000 (21.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 2,300, a 33.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 17,118 (1.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.

FeatureEPYC 9754Xeon w9-3595X
Cores / Threads
128 / 256+113%
60 / 120
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.8 GHz+55%
Base Clock
2.25 GHz+13%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+128%
112.5 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Bergamo (2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
98,450
97,534
Cinebench R23 Multi
104,584
130,000+24%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,634
2,300+41%
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,825
17,118+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9754 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 9754 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).

FeatureEPYC 9754Xeon w9-3595X
Socket
SP5
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6 TB+50%
4096 GB
RAM Channels
12+50%
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+14%
112
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.

FeatureEPYC 9754Xeon w9-3595X
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
—
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
true
Target Use
Data Center / Cloud Native
High-end Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9754 was priced at $11900, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($11900 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3595X was $6011 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 66.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9754Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP
$11900
$5889-51%
Performance per Dollar
8.3
16.6+100%
Release Date
2023
2024
Search EPYC 9754 on AmazonSearch Xeon w9-3595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.