Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9754

128 Cores256 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9634
84 / 168
107,944
+9.6%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9754
128 / 256
98,450
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI Max+ 395
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low163 FPS
medium134 FPS
high113 FPS
ultra89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low238 FPS
medium211 FPS
high174 FPS
ultra138 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low650 FPS
medium541 FPS
high481 FPS
ultra422 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9634
low899 FPS
medium819 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra621 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low876 FPS
medium793 FPS
high682 FPS
ultra592 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9634
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9634
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low299 FPS
medium228 FPS
high206 FPS
ultra185 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9634
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low250 FPS
medium221 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra136 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9634
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low308 FPS
medium277 FPS
high257 FPS
ultra210 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9634
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9754
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅Costs $1,596 less on MSRP ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 290W instead of 360W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9634 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,825 vs 85,000).
    • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
    • ❌24.1% higher power demand at 360W vs 290W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 9634 better than EPYC 9754?
    Yes. EPYC 9634 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 405.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and 9.6% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9634 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the stronger fit. You are getting 405.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 9634 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9634 comes in $1,596 cheaper on MSRP at $10,304 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.6% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 9754 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

    EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9754 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 9634

    The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

    AMD

    EPYC 9754

    The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the EPYC 9754 offers 128 cores / 256 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 44 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9634 (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9754 uses Bergamo (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the EPYC 9754's 98,450 — a 9.2% lead for the EPYC 9634. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 1,634, a 9.7% lead for the EPYC 9634 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 16,825 (133.9% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754.

    FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9754
    Cores / Threads
    84 / 168
    128 / 256+52%
    Boost Clock
    3.7 GHz+19%
    3.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.25 GHz
    2.25 GHz
    L3 Cache
    384 MB (total)+50%
    256 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    5 nm, 6 nm
    5 nm
    Architecture
    Genoa (2022−2023)
    Bergamo (2023)
    PassMark
    107,944+10%
    98,450
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    —
    104,584
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,800+10%
    1,634
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    85,000+405%
    16,825
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and SP5 (EPYC 9754).

    FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9754
    Socket
    SP5
    SP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-4800
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    6144 GB
    6 TB
    RAM Channels
    12
    12
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128
    128
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E.

    FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9754
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    Yes
    —
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    AMD-V, SEV-SNP
    Target Use
    Server/Datacenter
    Data Center / Cloud Native
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 9634 was priced at $10304, while the EPYC 9754 came in at $11900. On launch pricing ($10304 vs $11900), EPYC 9634 was $1596 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9754 — making the EPYC 9634 the 23.5% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9754
    MSRP
    $10304-13%
    $11900
    Performance per Dollar
    10.5+27%
    8.3
    Release Date
    2022
    2023
    Search EPYC 9634 on AmazonSearch EPYC 9754 on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.