Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6960P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon 6960P

72 Cores144 Thrd500 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2024
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6960P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9634
84 / 168
107,944
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Xeon 6960P
72 / 144
130,659
+21.0%
brand logoCore i5-11500H
brand logoCore i9-9960X
brand logoCore i7-13790F
brand logoCore Ultra 7 265K
brand logoXeon w7-3565X
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X
brand logoXeon w9-3595X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6960P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low196 FPS
medium159 FPS
high128 FPS
ultra100 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low524 FPS
medium450 FPS
high358 FPS
ultra293 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low985 FPS
medium874 FPS
high826 FPS
ultra734 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9634
low899 FPS
medium819 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra621 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low985 FPS
medium891 FPS
high768 FPS
ultra658 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9634
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9634
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low320 FPS
medium240 FPS
high208 FPS
ultra185 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9634
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low265 FPS
medium231 FPS
high181 FPS
ultra145 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9634
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low329 FPS
medium298 FPS
high276 FPS
ultra236 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9634
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
Xeon 6960P
low230 FPS
medium211 FPS
high179 FPS
ultra165 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6960P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅+41.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • ✅Draws 290W instead of 500W, a 210W reduction.
  • ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,800 vs 2,100).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).

Xeon 6960P

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • ✅Costs $679 less on MSRP ($9,625 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 29.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (60,000 vs 85,000).
  • ❌72.4% higher power demand at 500W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6960P better than EPYC 9634?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6960P is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 pulls ahead with 41.7% better Geekbench multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the stronger fit. You are getting 41.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6960P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6960P comes in $679 cheaper on MSRP at $9,625 MSRP versus $10,304 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9634 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 41.7% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 29.6% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6960P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9634 vs Xeon 6960P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

Intel

Xeon 6960P

The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the EPYC 9634 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6960P (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 19% lead for the Xeon 6960P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 2,100, a 15.4% lead for the Xeon 6960P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 60,000 (34.5% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.

FeatureEPYC 9634Xeon 6960P
Cores / Threads
84 / 168+17%
72 / 144
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.25 GHz
2.7 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
432 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
107,944
130,659+21%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,800
2,100+17%
Geekbench 6 Multi
85,000+42%
60,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9634 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9634 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6960P — the Xeon 6960P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9634 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 3072 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9634) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the EPYC 9634 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).

FeatureEPYC 9634Xeon 6960P
Socket
SP5
LGA7529
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+100%
3072 GB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+33%
96
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.

FeatureEPYC 9634Xeon 6960P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
—
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server/Datacenter
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9634 was priced at $10304, while the Xeon 6960P came in at $9625. On launch pricing ($10304 vs $9625), Xeon 6960P was $679 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Xeon 6960P the 25.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9634Xeon 6960P
MSRP
$10304
$9625-7%
Performance per Dollar
10.5
13.6+30%
Release Date
2022
2024
Search EPYC 9634 on AmazonSearch Xeon 6960P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.