Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9654P

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9654P

96 Cores192 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9654P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9634
84 / 168
107,944
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9654P
96 / 192
116,324
+7.8%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9654P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low524 FPS
medium457 FPS
high365 FPS
ultra296 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9634
low899 FPS
medium819 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra621 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low902 FPS
medium822 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra623 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9634
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9634
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9634
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9634
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9634
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9654P
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9654P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅+266.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($10,304 MSRP vs $10,625 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 290W instead of 360W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,800 vs 2,025).

EPYC 9654P

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅+12.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (23,214 vs 85,000).
  • ❌
    3.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $10,625 MSRPvs$10,304 MSRP
  • ❌24.1% higher power demand at 360W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9634 better than EPYC 9654P?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9654P is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 pulls ahead with 266.2% better Geekbench multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the stronger fit. You are getting 266.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9634 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9654P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9634 comes in $321 cheaper on MSRP at $10,304 MSRP versus $10,625 MSRP, and it still gives you 266.2% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that EPYC 9654P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9654P is also 4.5% better value on MSRP (10.9 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9634 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 84 cores / 168 threads instead of 96/192 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9654P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

AMD

EPYC 9654P

The EPYC 9654P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 116,324 points. Launch price was $10,625.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the EPYC 9654P offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9654P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9654P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the EPYC 9654P's 116,324 — a 7.5% lead for the EPYC 9654P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 2,025, a 11.8% lead for the EPYC 9654P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 23,214 (114.2% advantage for the EPYC 9634). Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9654P
Cores / Threads
84 / 168
96 / 192+14%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.25 GHz
2.4 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
384 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
107,944
116,324+8%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,800
2,025+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi
85,000+266%
23,214
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and SP5 (EPYC 9654P).

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9654P
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9654P). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, EPYC 9654P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; EPYC 9654P rivals Xeon 8490H.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9654P
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Server/Datacenter
Data Center / Single Socket
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9634 was priced at $10304, while the EPYC 9654P came in at $10625. On launch pricing ($10304 vs $10625), EPYC 9634 was $321 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 10.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9654P — making the EPYC 9654P the 4.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9654P
MSRP
$10304-3%
$10625
Performance per Dollar
10.5
10.9+4%
Release Date
2022
2022
Search EPYC 9634 on AmazonSearch EPYC 9654P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.