Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9634

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9475F

48 Cores96 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9634 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9475F
48 / 96
122,476
+13.5%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
EPYC 9634
84 / 168
107,944
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9634 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low315 FPS
medium289 FPS
high240 FPS
ultra203 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low725 FPS
medium618 FPS
high485 FPS
ultra421 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra166 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low906 FPS
medium738 FPS
high668 FPS
ultra566 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low1139 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high901 FPS
ultra812 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low899 FPS
medium819 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra621 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low304 FPS
medium232 FPS
high210 FPS
ultra189 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium250 FPS
high197 FPS
ultra160 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low369 FPS
medium329 FPS
high286 FPS
ultra244 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9475F
low283 FPS
medium265 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9634
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9634: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9475F

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $2,712 less on MSRP ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 54.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.1 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($7,592 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (45,000 vs 85,000).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
  • ❌37.9% higher power demand at 400W vs 290W.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅+88.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ✅Draws 290W instead of 400W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9475F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 16.1 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $7,592 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9475F better than EPYC 9634?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9475F is ahead with a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 pulls ahead with 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core. EPYC 9634 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9634 is the stronger fit. You are getting 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 84 cores and 168 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9475F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9475F comes in $2,712 cheaper on MSRP at $7,592 MSRP versus $10,304 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9634 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 88.9% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 54.0% better value on MSRP (16.1 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9475F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9475F vs EPYC 9634 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9475F

The EPYC 9475F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,476 points. Launch price was $7,592.

AMD

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9475F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9634 offers 84 cores / 168 threads — the EPYC 9634 has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9475F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9475F (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.25 GHz). The EPYC 9475F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9634 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9475F scores 122,476 against the EPYC 9634's 107,944 — a 12.6% lead for the EPYC 9475F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,800, a 8.5% lead for the EPYC 9475F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 85,000 (61.5% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9475F vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9634
Cores / Threads
48 / 96
84 / 168+75%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+30%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.65 GHz+62%
2.25 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
384 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
122,476+13%
107,944
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960+9%
1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
45,000
85,000+89%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9475F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9634 — the EPYC 9475F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9475F) and SoC (EPYC 9634).

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9634
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+25%
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB
6144 GB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9475F targets Server, EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 9475F rivals Xeon 6952P; EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9634
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
—
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Server
Server/Datacenter
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9475F was priced at $7592, while the EPYC 9634 came in at $10304. On launch pricing ($7592 vs $10304), EPYC 9475F was $2712 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9475F delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9634 — making the EPYC 9475F the 42.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9475FEPYC 9634
MSRP
$7592-26%
$10304
Performance per Dollar
16.1+53%
10.5
Release Date
2024
2022
Search EPYC 9475F on AmazonSearch EPYC 9634 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.