Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9684X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9634

84 Cores168 Thrd290 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

EPYC 9684X

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9684X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9634
84 / 168
107,944
0.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9950X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
EPYC 9684X
96 / 192
122,017
+13.0%
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9684X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high122 FPS
ultra96 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low169 FPS
medium140 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra94 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9634
low280 FPS
medium246 FPS
high202 FPS
ultra166 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low506 FPS
medium442 FPS
high353 FPS
ultra287 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low671 FPS
medium560 FPS
high522 FPS
ultra454 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low668 FPS
medium558 FPS
high519 FPS
ultra452 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9634
low899 FPS
medium819 FPS
high706 FPS
ultra621 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low902 FPS
medium822 FPS
high708 FPS
ultra623 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9634
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9634
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9634
low304 FPS
medium233 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra192 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9634
low253 FPS
medium223 FPS
high176 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low252 FPS
medium223 FPS
high175 FPS
ultra142 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9634
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low316 FPS
medium284 FPS
high263 FPS
ultra221 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9634
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
1080P
EPYC 9684X
low234 FPS
medium206 FPS
high173 FPS
ultra161 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9684X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9634

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $4,452 less on MSRP ($10,304 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 26.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $14,756 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 290W instead of 400W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (107,944 vs 122,017).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (384 MB vs 1.1 GB).

EPYC 9684X

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅+13% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 384 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9634 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($14,756 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
  • ❌37.9% higher power demand at 400W vs 290W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9634 better than EPYC 9684X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9634 is ahead with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9684X pulls ahead with 13% better PassMark. EPYC 9684X also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 384 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9684X is the stronger fit. You are getting 13% better PassMark, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 384 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9634 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9634 comes in $4,452 cheaper on MSRP at $10,304 MSRP versus $14,756 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9684X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 13% better PassMark. It is also 26.7% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9684X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 200% larger total L3 cache (1.1 GB vs 384 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 84/168. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9684X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9634

The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.

AMD

EPYC 9684X

The EPYC 9684X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1152 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 122,017 points. Launch price was $14,756.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the EPYC 9684X offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9684X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9684X — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 9684X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the EPYC 9684X's 122,017 — a 12.2% lead for the EPYC 9684X. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 1152 MB (total) on the EPYC 9684X.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9684X
Cores / Threads
84 / 168
96 / 192+14%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.25 GHz
2.55 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
384 MB (total)
1152 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
5 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Genoa-X (2023)
PassMark
107,944
122,017+13%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,800
—
Geekbench 6 Multi
85,000
—
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 GB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and SP5 (EPYC 9684X).

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9684X
Socket
SP5
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB
6 TB
RAM Channels
12
12
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9684X). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, EPYC 9684X targets HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; EPYC 9684X rivals Xeon 6979P.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9684X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Server/Datacenter
HPC / Cache Sensitive Workloads
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9634 was priced at $10304, while the EPYC 9684X came in at $14756. On launch pricing ($10304 vs $14756), EPYC 9634 was $4452 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9684X — making the EPYC 9634 the 23.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9634EPYC 9684X
MSRP
$10304-30%
$14756
Performance per Dollar
10.5+27%
8.3
Release Date
2022
2023
Search EPYC 9634 on AmazonSearch EPYC 9684X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.