EPYC 9754
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9754
2023Why buy it
- ✅+117.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8,001 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 197.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (48,000 vs 104,584).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX better than EPYC 9754?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9754 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — a 52.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX's 95,891 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 48,000 (74.2% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 2,669, a 48.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 22,298 (28% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+300% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+71% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 4 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 98,450+3% | 95,891 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 104,584+118% | 48,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,634 | 2,669+63% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,825 | 22,298+33% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9754 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Native | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9754 was priced at $11900, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX came in at $3899. On launch pricing ($11900 vs $3899), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX was $8001 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX the 99.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11900 | $3899-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 24.6+196% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
