EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6741P

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6741P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9754

128 / 256

98,450

0.0%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon 6741P

48 / 96

100,660

+2.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6741P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6741P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6741P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (98,450 vs 100,660).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 22.8 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $4,421 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 360W vs 300W.

Xeon 6741P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,479 less on MSRP ($4,421 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 175.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($4,421 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 300W instead of 360W, a 60W reduction.
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6741P better than EPYC 9754?

Yes. Xeon 6741P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6741P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6741P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.2% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6741P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6741P comes in $7,479 cheaper on MSRP at $4,421 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 175.2% better value on MSRP (22.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6741P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 128/256. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6741P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Xeon 6741P

The Xeon 6741P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 100,660 points. Launch price was $4,421.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Xeon 6741P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6741P — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 6741P (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6741P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Xeon 6741P's 100,660 — a 2.2% lead for the Xeon 6741P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 3,195, a 64.7% lead for the Xeon 6741P that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6741P.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon 6741P
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+167%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	2.5 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	98,450	100,660+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	104,584	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,634	3,195+96%
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,825	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6741P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6741P — the Xeon 6741P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9754 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Xeon 6741P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 136 (Xeon 6741P) — the Xeon 6741P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon 6741P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6741P). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Xeon 6741P targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon 6741P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon 6741P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Native	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9754 was priced at $11900, while the Xeon 6741P came in at $4421. On launch pricing ($11900 vs $4421), Xeon 6741P was $7479 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6741P — making the Xeon 6741P the 93.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon 6741P
MSRP	$11900	$4421-63%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	22.8+175%
Release Date	2023	2025

Search EPYC 9754 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6741P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.