
EPYC 9754 vs Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9754

Xeon 6747P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9754
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6747P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,631) | ✅ More affordable ($6,497) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bergamo (2023) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+69%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,631) | ✅ More affordable ($6,497) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and Xeon 6747P

EPYC 9754
The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 22.9% clock advantage for the Xeon 6747P (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 3.2% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 2,000, a 20.1% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 45,000 (91.1% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+167% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 2.7 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Bergamo (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 98,450 | 101,685+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 104,584 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,634 | 2,000+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,825 | 45,000+167% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 199.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the EPYC 9754 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / Cloud Native | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. At current prices ($10631 vs $6497), the Xeon 6747P is $4134 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Xeon 6747P the 51.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9754 | Xeon 6747P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11900 | $6497-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10631 | $6497-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3 | 15.7+69% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















