EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
EPYC 7773X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7773X
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,800) | ✅ More affordable ($2,699.99) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan-X (2022) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+234%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($8,800) | ✅ More affordable ($2,699.99) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 42.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 3,349, a 74.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 30,722 (37.7% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+167% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+54% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+500% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 93,660+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 60,336 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | 3,349+118% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+46% | 30,722 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. At current prices ($8800 vs $2699.99), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $6100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 34.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 107.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $2899-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8800 | $2699.99-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 34.7+234% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7773X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
