
EPYC 7773X

Xeon 6740P
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon 6740P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon 6740P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon 6740P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 288 MB).
- β 45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- β Delivers 87.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- β Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7773X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (90,684 vs 91,340).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (288 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7773X better than Xeon 6740P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon 6740P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

Xeon 6740P
The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads β the EPYC 7773X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P β a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6740P (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024β2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 β a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7773X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+33% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+167% | 288 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Granite Rapids (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 90,684 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6740P β the Xeon 6740P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) β the EPYC 7773X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Server | High-density Compute |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the Xeon 6740P came in at $4650. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $4650), Xeon 6740P was $4150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P β making the Xeon 6740P the 61.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $4650-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 19.5+87% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















