EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8368

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7773X

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7773X

64 / 128

91,340

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 / 76

92,054

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8368 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8368: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7773X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,586 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7773X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 45,000).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7773X better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. EPYC 7773X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 80% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7773X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 768 MB versus 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7773X is the stronger fit. You are getting 80% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1247.4% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7773X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8368 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7773X comes in 22.0% more expensive on MSRP at $8,800 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8368 is also 22.9% better value on MSRP (12.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7773X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 38/76. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7773X

The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 2.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 7773X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 1,961, a 24.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 25,000 (57.1% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+68%	38 / 76
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1247%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	91,340	92,054
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,536	1,961+28%
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000+80%	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the EPYC 7773X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4 TB	6 TB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8368 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Server	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $7214), Xeon Platinum 8368 was $1586 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 20.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP	$8800	$7214-18%
Performance per Dollar	10.4	12.8+23%
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 7773X on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.