EPYC 7773X
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+101.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,901 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,298 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX better than EPYC 7773X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7773X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — a 40.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX's 95,891 — a 4.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 2,669, a 53.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 22,298 (67.5% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 5.3 GHz+51% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz+82% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+500% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 95,891+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 48,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | 2,669+74% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+102% | 22,298 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7773X supports up to 4 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX came in at $3899. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $3899), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX was $4901 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX the 81.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $3899-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 24.6+137% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7773X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
