EPYC 7773X
Xeon w9-3595X
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+162.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+582.7% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 385W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,911 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,118 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌37.5% higher power demand at 385W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than EPYC 7773X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 6.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 2,300, a 39.8% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 17,118 (89.8% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+7% | 60 / 120 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+583% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 97,534+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 130,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | 2,300+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+163% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Xeon w9-3595X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the EPYC 7773X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3595X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3595X was $2911 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 45.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $5889-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 16.6+60% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7773X and Xeon w9-3595X
