EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 9355P

AMD

EPYC 7773X

64 Cores128 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
VS
AMD

EPYC 9355P

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024

EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 9355P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 9355P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 9355P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7773X

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (91,340 vs 97,249).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9355P moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9355P

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $5,802 less on MSRP ($2,998 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 212.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
  • βœ…Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9355P better than EPYC 7773X?
Yes. EPYC 9355P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9355P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9355P is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9355P is the better buy right now. EPYC 9355P comes in $5,802 cheaper on MSRP at $2,998 MSRP versus $8,800 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 212.5% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9355P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 9355P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7773X

The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

AMD

EPYC 9355P

The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9355P offers 32 cores / 64 threads β€” the EPYC 7773X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P β€” a 22.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9355P (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9355P uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the EPYC 9355P's 97,249 β€” a 6.3% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P.

FeatureEPYC 7773XEPYC 9355P
Cores / Threads
64 / 128+100%
32 / 64
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.55 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+200%
256 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Milan-X (2022)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
91,340
97,249+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,536
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
45,000
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9355P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9355P β€” the EPYC 9355P supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9355P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB β€” 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7773X) vs 12 (EPYC 9355P). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and SP5 (EPYC 9355P).

FeatureEPYC 7773XEPYC 9355P
Socket
SP3
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-6000+88%
Max RAM Capacity
4 TB
6 TB+50%
RAM Channels
8
12+50%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.

FeatureEPYC 7773XEPYC 9355P
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Server
Data Center / Single Socket
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the EPYC 9355P came in at $2998. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $2998), EPYC 9355P was $5802 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9355P β€” making the EPYC 9355P the 103% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7773XEPYC 9355P
MSRP
$8800
$2998-66%
Performance per Dollar
10.4
32.4+212%
Release Date
2022
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.