Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Xeon 6960P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6960P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6960P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6960P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,526 less on MSRP ($4,099 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (31,000 vs 60,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 432 MB).
Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+93.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+237.5% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX better than Xeon 6960P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6960P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX scores 106,263 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 20.6% lead for the Xeon 6960P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 2,100, a 41.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 31,000 vs 60,000 (63.7% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 72 / 144+125% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+48% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 432 MB (total)+238% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 106,263 | 130,659+23% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 83,982 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+52% | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 31,000 | 60,000+94% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 12 (Xeon 6960P). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 3072 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX was priced at $4099, while the Xeon 6960P came in at $9625. On launch pricing ($4099 vs $9625), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX was $5526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX delivers 25.9 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX the 62.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4099-57% | $9625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.9+90% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX and Xeon 6960P
