Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6781P

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6781P Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

32 / 64

106,263

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Xeon 6781P

80 / 160

117,946

+11.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6781P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6781P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,861 less on MSRP ($4,099 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).
✅Delivers 96.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $8,960 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (106,263 vs 117,946).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 336 MB).

Xeon 6781P

2025

Why buy it

✅+11% higher PassMark.
✅+162.5% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 128 MB).
✅6.3% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 128) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($8,960 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6781P better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is ahead with a 33.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6781P pulls ahead with 11% better PassMark. Xeon 6781P also has the bigger cache pool with 162.5% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6781P is the stronger fit. You are getting 11% better PassMark, backed by 80 cores and 160 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 162.5% larger total L3 cache (336 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6781P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6781P comes in 118.6% more expensive on MSRP at $8,960 MSRP versus $4,099 MSRP, and it still gives you 11% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 33.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is also 96.9% better value on MSRP (25.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6781P is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon 6781P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.

Xeon 6781P

The Xeon 6781P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 80 cores and 160 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 336 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 117,946 points. Launch price was $8,960.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6781P offers 80 cores / 160 threads — the Xeon 6781P has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6781P — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6781P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX scores 106,263 against the Xeon 6781P's 117,946 — a 10.4% lead for the Xeon 6781P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs 336 MB (total) on the Xeon 6781P.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6781P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	80 / 160+150%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+100%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	336 MB (total)+163%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Shimada Peak (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	106,263	117,946+11%
Cinebench R23 Multi	83,982	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	31,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6781P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6781P supports up to 4 TB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs 136 (Xeon 6781P) — the Xeon 6781P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6781P
Socket	sTR5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	4 TB+100%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	136+6%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6781P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation, Xeon 6781P targets Data Center / Cloud Scale. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon 6781P rivals EPYC 9655.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6781P
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	High-end Workstation	Data Center / Cloud Scale

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX was priced at $4099, while the Xeon 6781P came in at $8960. On launch pricing ($4099 vs $8960), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX was $4861 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX delivers 25.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6781P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX the 65.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX	Xeon 6781P
MSRP	$4099-54%	$8960
Performance per Dollar	25.9+96%	13.2
Release Date	2025	2025

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX on Amazon

Search Xeon 6781P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.