Ryzen Z2 Go
VS
Ryzen 3 PRO 210

Ryzen Z2 Go vs Ryzen 3 PRO 210

AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

4 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen Z2 Go is positioned at rank #935 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Z2 Go

#923
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1685%
#924
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1661%
#925
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1524%
#926
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1518%
#927
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1504%
#929
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1452%
#930
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1392%
#931
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1390%
#932
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1353%
#935
Ryzen Z2 Go
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen Z2 Go is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen Z2 GoRyzen 3 PRO 210
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rembrandt R (2025) / 6 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen Z2 GoRyzen 3 PRO 210
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z2 Go and Ryzen 3 PRO 210

AMD

Ryzen Z2 Go

The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 210

The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Z2 Go and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Z2 Go uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z2 Go scores 12,188 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 210's 12,155 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Z2 Go. Both processors carry 8 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen Z2 GoRyzen 3 PRO 210
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Process
6 nm
4 nm-33%
Architecture
Rembrandt R (2025)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark
12,188
12,155
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,802
Geekbench 6 Single
1,842
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,073
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 210). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.

FeatureRyzen Z2 GoRyzen 3 PRO 210
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
SVM
Target Use
Budget