Ryzen Z2 Go vs Core i5-13400F
Ryzen Z2 Go
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen Z2 Go is positioned at rank #935 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Z2 Go
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Z2 Go | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Rembrandt R (2025) / 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Z2 Go | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z2 Go and Core i5-13400F
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Z2 Go packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Z2 Go uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z2 Go scores 12,188 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 69% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 5,802 vs 16,211 (94.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,842 vs 2,407, a 26.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,073 vs 11,408 (61% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 16+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt R (2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 12,188 | 25,029+105% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,802 | 16,211+179% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,842 | 2,407+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,073 | 11,408+88% |
Memory & Platform
Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen Z2 Go) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Ryzen Z2 Go | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Z2 Go and Core i5-13400F
