CPU
GPU
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank 72 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is on rank 721, so the Quadro P2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18303.9% higher G3D Mark score and 900% more VRAM (5 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2300.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+18303.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18303.9%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $227 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1116.1% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon HD 2300.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1116.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 51 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 18303.9%. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386+18304% | 51 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS+241% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+500% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+400% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 has 512 MB. The Quadro P2200 offers 900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+900% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+400% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1+34% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6+130% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 50W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+12410% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 costs 93.4% less ($212 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 3.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the Quadro P2200 offers 1114.7% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $100-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $227 | $15-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3+1115% | 3.4 |
| Codename | GP106 | Broadway |
| Release | June 10 2019 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #281 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2200 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300
