Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Radeon HD 2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Radeon HD 2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Radeon HD 2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 190W, a 140W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 121).
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
26.6% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon HD 2400

2009

Why buy it

✅+137.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 200.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌280% higher power demand at 190W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 137.3% in PassMark G3D (121 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 200.3% (1.5 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 2300 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Radeon HD 2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Radeon HD 2400

The Radeon HD 2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 scores 51 versus the Radeon HD 2400's 121 — the Radeon HD 2400 leads by 137.3%. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 2400 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 800 (Radeon HD 2400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2400).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Radeon HD 2400
G3D Mark Score	51	121+137%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	160 KB+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Radeon HD 2400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 2400.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Radeon HD 2400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 2400's 190W — a 116.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Radeon HD 2400
TDP	50W-74%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.0+67%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 2400 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2400 was 21% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2400) — the Radeon HD 2400 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 2300 (2010 vs 2009).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Radeon HD 2400
MSRP	$100	$79-21%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	1.5+200%
Codename	Broadway	RV790
Release	January 7 2010	April 2 2009
Ranking	#846	#762

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2300 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.