Sempron 2500+
VS
Pentium M 1.30

Sempron 2500+ vs Pentium M 1.30

AMD

Sempron 2500+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.30

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 2500+ is positioned at rank 1007 and the Pentium M 1.30 is on rank 676, so the Pentium M 1.30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 2500+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33772%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
31911%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23170%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6980%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5529%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4837%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2770%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2734%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2489%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2489%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2461%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2395%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2362%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2352%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2331%
#1007
Sempron 2500+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
100%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
99%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
99%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
98%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
97%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
96%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
94%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
94%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
94%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.30

#664
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
931%
#665
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
918%
#666
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
843%
#667
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
839%
#668
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
831%
#670
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
803%
#671
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
770%
#672
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
768%
#673
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
748%
#676
Pentium M 1.30
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#681
Core i3-N305
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 2500+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 1.30 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 12.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightSempron 2500+Pentium M 1.30
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightSempron 2500+Pentium M 1.30
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 2500+ and Pentium M 1.30

AMD

Sempron 2500+

The Sempron 2500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Pentium M 1.30

The Pentium M 1.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Sempron 2500+ and Pentium M 1.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the Sempron 2500+ versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium M 1.30 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 2500+. The Sempron 2500+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.30 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 2500+ scores 277 against the Pentium M 1.30's 315 — a 12.8% lead for the Pentium M 1.30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureSempron 2500+Pentium M 1.30
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.75 GHz+35%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
1 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
Palermo (2001−2005)
Banias (2003)
PassMark
277
315+14%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 2500+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 1.30 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureSempron 2500+Pentium M 1.30
Socket
754
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1