Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P2200
Quadro FX 2500M
Popular choices:
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2500M is positioned at rank 282 and the Quadro P2200 is on rank 72, so the Quadro P2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2500M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2500M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4205.5% higher G3D Mark score and 900% more VRAM (5 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 2500M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4205.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4205.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2500M and Quadro P2200
Quadro FX 2500M
The Quadro FX 2500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 218 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 2500M scores 218 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the Quadro P2200 leads by 4205.5%. The Quadro FX 2500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 218 | 9,386+4206% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1280+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS+514% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.25 MB+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2500M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 5 GB+900% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.25 MB+400% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2500M draws 189W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 75W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 201mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 125.1+10325% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2500M | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $429 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $227 |
| Codename | GT200B | GP106 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #815 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2500M and Quadro P2200
