Quadro FX 2500M
VS
Quadro FX 1700

Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2500M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2500M is positioned at rank 282 and the Quadro FX 1700 is on rank 395, so the Quadro FX 2500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2500M

#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
97%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
95%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
92%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
91%
#114
Quadro GP100
MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335
90%
#267
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6777%
#282
Quadro FX 2500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
98%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
97%
#287
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
95%
#289
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
95%
#290
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
94%
#291
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
93%
#294
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
91%
#295
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
90%
#296
GRID P6-2Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700

#380
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
47655%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
100%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
97%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
87%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
77%
#399
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
77%
#400
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
77%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
74%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
74%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
71%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
65%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
65%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
58%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
55%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 2500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1700.

InsightQuadro FX 2500MQuadro FX 1700
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2500M and Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2500M

The Quadro FX 2500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 218 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 2500M scores 218 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

FeatureQuadro FX 2500MQuadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score
218
216
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 2500MQuadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro FX 2500MQuadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 2500M draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2500M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 2500MQuadro FX 1700
TDP
189W
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.2+9%
1.1