Sempron 3100+
VS
Atom D425

Sempron 3100+ vs Atom D425

AMD

Sempron 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Atom D425

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3100+ is positioned at rank 1068 and the Atom D425 is on rank 1088, so the Sempron 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3100+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
54496%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
51493%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
37388%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
11263%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8922%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7805%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4470%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4412%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4017%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4017%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3972%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3865%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3811%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3795%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3761%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
100%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
98%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
98%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
94%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
87%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
86%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
83%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
81%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
75%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
71%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
70%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
69%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
69%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
67%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
63%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D425

#1076
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3047%
#1077
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3002%
#1078
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2756%
#1079
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2744%
#1080
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2718%
#1082
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2625%
#1083
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2517%
#1084
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2513%
#1085
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2445%
#1088
Atom D425
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom D425 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightSempron 3100+Atom D425
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Sempron 3100+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightSempron 3100+Atom D425
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3100+ and Atom D425

AMD

Sempron 3100+

The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

Processing Power

The Sempron 3100+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D425's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom D425. The Sempron 3100+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom D425 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3100+ scores 372 against the Atom D425's 385 — a 3.4% lead for the Atom D425. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureSempron 3100+Atom D425
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.83 GHz+2%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Palermo (2001−2005)
Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark
372
385+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Sempron 3100+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D425 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR 400 MHz on the Sempron 3100+ versus DDR3-800 on the Atom D425 — the Sempron 3100+ supports 197% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D425 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 3 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: nForce3,VIA K8T800 (Sempron 3100+) and Intel NM10 (Atom D425).

FeatureSempron 3100+Atom D425
Socket
754
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR 400 MHz+13233%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Sempron 3100+) / not specified (Atom D425). The Atom D425 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Sempron 3100+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Sempron 3100+ targets Budget.

FeatureSempron 3100+Atom D425
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
Target Use
Budget