CPU
GPU
Sempron 3100+
Core Solo T1200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3100+ is positioned at rank 1068 and the Core Solo T1200 is on rank 1241, so the Sempron 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3100+
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+43%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1200
Sempron 3100+
The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.
Core Solo T1200
The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1200 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3100+. The Sempron 3100+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1200 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 3100+ scores 372 against the Core Solo T1200's 355 — a 4.7% lead for the Sempron 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz+20% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 372+5% | 355 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 3100+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | BGA479 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR 400 MHz | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 3 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Sempron 3100+) / not specified (Core Solo T1200). Primary use case: Sempron 3100+ targets Budget.
| Feature | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Sempron 3100+ launched at $65 MSRP, while the Core Solo T1200 debuted at $209. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Core Solo T1200 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Sempron 3100+ delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 35.5 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1200 — making the Core Solo T1200 the 35.5% better value option.
| Feature | Sempron 3100+ | Core Solo T1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65-69% | $209 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 35.5+43% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 3100+ and Core Solo T1200
