Sempron 3300+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Sempron 3300+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Sempron 3300+ is positioned at rank 923 and the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is on rank 1157, so the Sempron 3300+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3300+
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Sempron 3300+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Sempron 3300+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Sempron 3300+
The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 3300+. The Sempron 3300+ uses the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses Oakville (2003−2004). In PassMark, the Sempron 3300+ scores 412 against the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+'s 420 — a 1.9% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.
| Feature | Sempron 3300+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512K |
| Process | 130 nm | — |
| Architecture | Palermo (2001−2005) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 412 | 420+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 754 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Sempron 3300+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Sempron 3300+) / false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.
| Feature | Sempron 3300+ | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
