
Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250

Radeon HD 3300
Popular choices:

Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 3300 is positioned at rank #251 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 195.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1250.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+195.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-195.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $49), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 2794.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2794.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3300 and Radeon Xpress 1250

Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 43 — the Radeon HD 3300 leads by 195.3%. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127+195% | 43 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+138% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+233% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250). Decoder: UVD+ vs Avivo.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Legacy | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD+ | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264/AVC,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 96.4% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 65W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon HD 3300 costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.4 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.9 (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 2722.2% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3300 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-90% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.4+2722% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Cayman | Oland |
| Release | December 1 2011 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #598 | #871 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















