Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 7310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 7310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 7310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$30 MSRPvs$20 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).
❌295.7% higher power demand at 186W vs 47W.

Radeon HD 7310

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($20 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
✅Draws 47W instead of 186W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7310 instead at 128 vs 127, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 3300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $20 vs $30, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.2% (6.4 vs 4.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 3300 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 7310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon HD 7310

The Radeon HD 7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $59.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 and the Radeon HD 7310 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 7310 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310).

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 7310
G3D Mark Score	127	128
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+233%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS+213%	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 7310
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7310. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7310) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 7310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Radeon HD 7310's 47W — a 119.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 7310
TDP	186W	47W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	0.7	2.7+286%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Radeon HD 7310 launched at $20. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7310 was 33.3% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 6.4 (Radeon HD 7310) — the Radeon HD 7310 offers 52.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7310 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 7310
MSRP	$30	$20-33%
Performance per Dollar	4.2	6.4+52%
Codename	Cayman	Cape Verde
Release	December 1 2011	May 1 2013
Ranking	#598	#841

Search Radeon HD 3300 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.