GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3300

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 205

2019

Why buy it

  • Radeon HD 3300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 186W, a 176W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

  • 4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1760% higher power demand at 186W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (127 vs 126), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 205 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68% (4.2 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 205 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300).

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
G3D Mark Score
126
127
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 3
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+141%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
144 KB
320 KB+122%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300.

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs H.264/AVC,VC-1 (Radeon HD 3300).

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
Encoder
None
Legacy
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
UVD+
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264/AVC,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W — a 179.6% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
TDP
10W-95%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
12.6+1700%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 68% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 205Radeon HD 3300
MSRP
$50
$30-40%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
4.2+68%
Codename
GP108B
Cayman
Release
February 20 2019
December 1 2011
Ranking
#643
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.