
GeForce 205

Radeon HD 3300
GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 205
2019Why buy it
- ✅Radeon HD 3300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 186W, a 176W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1760% higher power demand at 186W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 205 vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 205
The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 126 | 127 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+141% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 320 KB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs H.264/AVC,VC-1 (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Legacy |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264/AVC,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W — a 179.6% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-95% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6+1700% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 68% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $30-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 4.2+68% |
| Codename | GP108B | Cayman |
| Release | February 20 2019 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #643 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














