GeForce 205 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 205 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 205 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 205

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $349 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 673.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 50W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 698% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 50W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (130 vs 126), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 205 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 205 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 673.4% (2.5 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. MOBILITY RADEON X1800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 205 vs MOBILITY RADEON X1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

The MOBILITY RADEON X1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X1800).

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
G3D Mark Score
126
130+3%
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+40%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
144 KB+80%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X1800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 205 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 carries 256 MB. GeForce 205 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X1800. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 205) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X1800) — the GeForce 205 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 9.0c (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+65%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X1800's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X1800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
TDP
10W-80%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.6+385%
2.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the MOBILITY RADEON X1800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 205 was 87.5% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs 0.3 (MOBILITY RADEON X1800) — the GeForce 205 offers 733.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 205MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP
$50-87%
$399
Performance per Dollar
2.5+733%
0.3
Codename
GP108B
Broadway
Release
February 20 2019
January 7 2010
Ranking
#643
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.