GeForce 205
VS
GeForce Go 7600

GeForce 205 vs GeForce Go 7600

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 205 is positioned at rank 614 and the GeForce Go 7600 is on rank 76, so the GeForce Go 7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 205

#604
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4308%
#606
3906%
#607
3895%
#611
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3542%
#612
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3518%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
99%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
99%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
99%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
98%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
97%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
96%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
94%
#623
93%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
92%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#626
90%
#627
89%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
88%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
283%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
272%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
269%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
269%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
268%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
267%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
263%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
262%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
260%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
259%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
256%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
255%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
251%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
251%
#61
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
313%
#75
GeForce RTX 3090
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $900
99%
#76
GeForce Go 7600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#76
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
95%
#77
GeForce RTX 4090
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649
90%
#78
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100
82%
#83
Radeon R9 A375
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
82%
#85
80%
#86
Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
78%
#87
GeForce GT 710
MSRP: $35|Avg: $50
69%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
63%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 205 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce 205 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 205.

InsightGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 205 and GeForce Go 7600

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7600

The GeForce Go 7600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 128 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the GeForce Go 7600 reaches 128 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the GeForce Go 7600 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
G3D Mark Score
126
128+2%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1152+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7972 TFLOPS
2.378 TFLOPS+198%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1033 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
96+300%
L1 Cache
144 KB+50%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs No (GeForce Go 7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7600).

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
PureVideo
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the GeForce Go 7600's 170W — a 177.8% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
TDP
10W-94%
170W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.6+1475%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 205 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce Go 7600
MSRP
$50
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GP108B
GK104
Release
February 20 2019
June 25 2013
Ranking
#643
#450