GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 205 is positioned at rank #614 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 205

#604

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4308%

#606

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3906%

#607

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3895%

#611

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3542%

#612

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3518%

#614

GeForce 205

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

100%

#615

GeForce 9600 GSO

MSRP: $129|Avg: $25

99%

#616

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $40

99%

#617

GeForce 9400

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

99%

#618

GeForce 7350 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

98%

#620

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

97%

#621

Mobility Radeon HD 4870

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

96%

#622

GeForce 9800M GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $5

94%

#623

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

MSRP: $140|Avg: $35

93%

#624

Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

92%

#625

GeForce 8300 GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

91%

#626

Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

90%

#627

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8470 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

89%

#628

GeForce 9500M GS

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

88%

#629

GeForce 8800 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 205 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce 205 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8700M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 205 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8700M GT.

Insight	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 205 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 205 Benchmark Check

GeForce 8700M GT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 205 and GeForce 8700M GT

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

GeForce 8700M GT

The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the GeForce 8700M GT reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 8700M GT uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 224 (GeForce 8700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
G3D Mark Score	126+2%	124
Architecture	Pascal	G9x
Process Node	14 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+71%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 205 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8700M GT has 256 MB. The GeForce 205 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
DirectX	10.1	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs No (GeForce 8700M GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 150W — a 175% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (GeForce 8700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce 205	GeForce 8700M GT
TDP	10W-93%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	12.6+1475%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 205 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 8700M GT launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 8700M GT costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GeForce 205) vs Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 205 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).