GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 8700M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 205

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • GeForce 8700M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce 8700M GT

2008

Why buy it

  • 4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8700M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 205 instead at 126 vs 124, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 205 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 205 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce 8700M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8700M GT

The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the GeForce 8700M GT reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 8700M GT uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 224 (GeForce 8700M GT).

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
G3D Mark Score
126+2%
124
Architecture
Pascal
G9x
Process Node
14 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
384+71%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 205 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8700M GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 205 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
DirectX
10.1
10.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs No (GeForce 8700M GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT).

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 150W — a 175% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (GeForce 8700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
TDP
10W-93%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.6+1475%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the GeForce 8700M GT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce 8700M GT was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 205GeForce 8700M GT
MSRP
$50
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
Infinity
Codename
GP108B
NB9E-GTX
Release
February 20 2019
July 15 2008
Ranking
#643
#825

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.