
GeForce 205

GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 205
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce 8700M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 205 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce 8700M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 205 vs GeForce 8700M GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 205
The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

GeForce 8700M GT
The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the GeForce 8700M GT reaches 124 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 8700M GT uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 224 (GeForce 8700M GT).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 126+2% | 124 |
| Architecture | Pascal | G9x |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 205 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8700M GT carries 256 MB. GeForce 205 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 205) vs No (GeForce 8700M GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the GeForce 8700M GT's 150W — a 175% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (GeForce 8700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-93% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6+1475% | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the GeForce 8700M GT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce 8700M GT was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs Infinity (GeForce 8700M GT) — the GeForce 8700M GT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 205 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 205 | GeForce 8700M GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | February 20 2019 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #643 | #825 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














