GeForce 205 vs RADEON X800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 205 vs RADEON X800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 205 vs RADEON X800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 205

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 287.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 55W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X800 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RADEON X800 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌450% higher power demand at 55W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (130 vs 126), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 205 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 287.7% (2.5 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 205 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X800 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 205 vs RADEON X800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 205

The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.

RADEON X800 SE

The RADEON X800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 205 scores 126 and the RADEON X800 SE reaches 130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 205 is built on Pascal while the RADEON X800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 205) vs 2,560 (RADEON X800 SE). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 SE). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
G3D Mark Score	126	130+3%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2560+567%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+1763%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	2900 MHz+179%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	160+567%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 205 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 205 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce 205 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 205 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 SE. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 205) vs 8 MB (RADEON X800 SE) — the RADEON X800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 205) vs 9_0b (RADEON X800 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
DirectX	10.1+12%	9_0b
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 205 draws 10W versus the RADEON X800 SE's 55W — a 138.5% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 205) vs 350W (RADEON X800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
TDP	10W-82%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	170mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	12.6+425%	2.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 205 came in at $50, while the RADEON X800 SE launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 205 was 75% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GeForce 205) vs 0.7 (RADEON X800 SE) — the GeForce 205 offers 257.1% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 SE (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce 205	RADEON X800 SE
MSRP	$50-75%	$200
Performance per Dollar	2.5+257%	0.7
Codename	GP108B	Strix Halo
Release	February 20 2019	January 6 2025
Ranking	#643	#98

Search GeForce 205 on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.