GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 3300

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600M GS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3300

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9600M GS

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 186W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 133.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $70 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

  • 0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • Delivers 126.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 24% higher power demand at 186W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9600M GS instead at 131 vs 127, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9600M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $70, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 126.2% (4.2 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9600M GS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600M GS

The GeForce 9600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 131 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9600M GS scores 131 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GS is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
G3D Mark Score
131+3%
127
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 3
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
1280+471%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9600M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9600M GS has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3300 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9600M GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9600M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
DirectX
10.0
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9600M GS) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs H.264/AVC,VC-1 (Radeon HD 3300).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
Encoder
No
Legacy
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD+
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264/AVC,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9600M GS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 9600M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
TDP
150W-19%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.9+29%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9600M GS came in at $70, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 57.1% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 121.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9600M GSRadeon HD 3300
MSRP
$70
$30-57%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
4.2+121%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Cayman
Release
July 15 2008
December 1 2011
Ranking
#825
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.