
GeForce 9600M GS

GeForce G200
GeForce 9600M GS vs GeForce G200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9600M GS vs GeForce G200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9600M GS vs GeForce G200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9600M GS
2008Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 311.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
GeForce G200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9600M GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌327.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9600M GS vs GeForce G200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9600M GS
The GeForce 9600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 131 points.

GeForce G200
The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600M GS scores 131 and the GeForce G200 reaches 136 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GS is built on G9x while the GeForce G200 uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 384 (GeForce G200).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 131 | 136+4% |
| Architecture | G9x | Pascal |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600M GS has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G200 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9600M GS gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9600M GS and 128-bit on the GeForce G200.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 10.1 (GeForce G200). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9600M GS) vs None (GeForce G200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GS draws 150W versus the GeForce G200's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 350W (GeForce G200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 4.5+400% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9600M GS came in at $70, while the GeForce G200 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce 9600M GS was 76.6% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 0.5 (GeForce G200) — the GeForce 9600M GS offers 280% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G200 (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | GeForce G200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-77% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9+280% | 0.5 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GP108 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #825 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














