GeForce 9600M GS vs Radeon HD 4330
GeForce 9600M GS
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9600M GS is positioned at rank 653 and the Radeon HD 4330 is on rank 292, so the Radeon HD 4330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9600M GS
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9600M GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4330 holds the technical lead. Priced at $9 (vs $20), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 129% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+129%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($9) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9600M GS and Radeon HD 4330
GeForce 9600M GS
The GeForce 9600M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 131 points.
Radeon HD 4330
The Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points. Launch price was $130.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9600M GS scores 131 and the Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9600M GS is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4330).
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 131 | 135+3% |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 640+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9600M GS comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4330 has 512 MB. The GeForce 9600M GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9600M GS draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 4330's 95W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 95W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.4+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9600M GS launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 4330 launched at $50 and now averages $9. The Radeon HD 4330 costs 55% less ($11 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (GeForce 9600M GS) vs 15.0 (Radeon HD 4330) — the Radeon HD 4330 offers 130.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 9600M GS | Radeon HD 4330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $50-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $9-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 15.0+131% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | RV770 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | October 21 2008 |
| Ranking | #825 | #920 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9600M GS and Radeon HD 4330
