
GeForce G105M

Radeon HD 3300
GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G105M
2016Why buy it
- β Draws 60W instead of 186W, a 126W reduction.
- β More future proof: Pascal (2016β2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- β 0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β210% higher power demand at 186W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G105M vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G105M
The GeForce G105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points. Launch price was $109.

Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G105M scores 133 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G105M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3300 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce G105M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G105M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 133+5% | 127 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.862 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 320 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce G105M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G105M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G105M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 3300) β the GeForce G105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G105M) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G105M) vs Legacy (Radeon HD 3300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD+. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G105M) vs H.264/AVC,VC-1 (Radeon HD 3300).
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Legacy |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD+ |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264/AVC,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G105M draws 60W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W β a 102.4% difference. The GeForce G105M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G105M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-68% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2+214% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce G105M (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce G105M | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $30 |
| Codename | GP107 | Cayman |
| Release | October 25 2016 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #443 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














