
GeForce 210

GeForce G105M
GeForce 210 vs GeForce G105M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 210 vs GeForce G105M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 210 vs GeForce G105M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 210
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅GeForce G105M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 60W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce G105M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce G105M
2016Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 60W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 210 vs GeForce G105M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210
The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

GeForce G105M
The GeForce G105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the GeForce G105M reaches 133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce G105M uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 640 (GeForce G105M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G105M). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 138+4% | 133 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.862 TFLOPS+134% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1392 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 240 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G105M carries 512 MB. GeForce 210 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the GeForce G105M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 210) vs 1 MB (GeForce G105M) — the GeForce G105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 10.1 (GeForce G105M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs No (GeForce G105M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G105M).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce G105M's 60W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (GeForce G105M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-83% | 60W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 13.8+527% | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | — |
| Codename | GP108B | GP107 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #643 | #443 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














