
GeForce 210

Radeon HD 5450
GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 210
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon HD 5450 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 151W, a 141W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon HD 5450
2009Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$60 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌1410% higher power demand at 151W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 5450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210
The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

Radeon HD 5450
The Radeon HD 5450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the Radeon HD 5450 reaches 136 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 5450 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 5450). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5450).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 138+1% | 136 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1440+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 2.088 TFLOPS+162% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 72+200% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5450 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5450 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5450.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5450).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the Radeon HD 5450's 151W — a 175.2% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5450). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-93% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.8+1433% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 210 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 5450 launched at $60. On MSRP, GeForce 210 was 16.7% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 210) vs 2.3 (Radeon HD 5450) — the GeForce 210 offers 21.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | Radeon HD 5450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8+22% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GP108B | Cypress |
| Release | February 20 2019 | September 30 2009 |
| Ranking | #643 | #682 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














