GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 6290M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 6290M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 6290M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 210

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon HD 6290M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 75W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon HD 6290M

2011

Why buy it

✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 75W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6290M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (140 vs 138), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 210 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 210 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6290M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 210 vs Radeon HD 6290M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210

The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

Radeon HD 6290M

The Radeon HD 6290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the Radeon HD 6290M reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6290M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6290M). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6290M).

Feature	GeForce 210	Radeon HD 6290M
G3D Mark Score	138	140+1%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7972 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+64%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	48+100%
L1 Cache	144 KB	192 KB+33%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 210 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 210	Radeon HD 6290M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290M carries 512 MB. GeForce 210 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and System on the Radeon HD 6290M.

Feature	GeForce 210	Radeon HD 6290M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the Radeon HD 6290M's 75W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 210	Radeon HD 6290M
TDP	10W-87%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	13.8+626%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 210	Radeon HD 6290M
MSRP	$50	—
Codename	GP108B	Blackcomb
Release	February 20 2019	January 4 2011
Ranking	#643	#654

Search GeForce 210 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6290M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.