
GeForce 210

GeForce 310
GeForce 210 vs GeForce 310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 210 vs GeForce 310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 210 vs GeForce 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 210
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅GeForce 310 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 210 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 33W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
GeForce 310
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌230% higher power demand at 33W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 210 vs GeForce 310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 210
The GeForce 210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 138 points.

GeForce 310
The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 210 scores 138 and the GeForce 310 reaches 143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 310 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 210) vs 384 (GeForce 310). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 210) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 310). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 941 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 138 | 143+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS+10% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+10% | 941 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 192 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 210 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 310 carries 512 MB. GeForce 210 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 210 and 128-bit on the GeForce 310. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce 210) vs 1 MB (GeForce 310) — the GeForce 310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 210) vs 10.1 (GeForce 310). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 210) vs None (GeForce 310). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 210) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 310).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 210 draws 10W versus the GeForce 310's 33W — a 107% difference. The GeForce 210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 210) vs 350W (GeForce 310). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-70% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.8+221% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 210 came in at $50, while the GeForce 310 launched at $45. On MSRP, GeForce 310 was 10% cheaper ($5 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (GeForce 210) vs 3.2 (GeForce 310) — the GeForce 310 offers 14.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 210 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 210 | GeForce 310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $45-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 3.2+14% |
| Codename | GP108B | GM108 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #643 | #810 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














